Export to txt, html, wri, doc, Palm Doc (PDB, PRC) and more.įree Templates: Calendar 2005, 2004, 2003, Emails, Presentation, To Do table, Album and Tracks report and more. Import from txt, wri, rtf, TreePad, CSV, Excel, Word, html, Palm Doc (PDB, PRC) and more.
#TREEDBNOTES TEMPLATES HOW TO PRO#
If I have a truly complex document (chapters, footnotes, etc.) I create and maintain it externally with WORD and just link it to UR.TreeDBNotes Pro is a powerful and easy-to-use personal database program, PIM, Word Processor, Alarm & Reminders, Contacts and passwords manager, e-Book maker with Tree Structure, advanced encryption and password Protection.įeatures: Search, Replace, History, Case options, Insert file/ link/ image/ time/ date/ symbols/ table / html table. However, looking only at notes with tables, I end up in WORD roughly 30 to 40% of the time to access a few advanced features. I have Office 2007, but functionality UR inherits from riched20.dll is sufficient for 90% of my rich text notes. Out of curiosity, do you guys have MS WORD? If so, do you edit UR notes externally in WORD very often? As for rich text and tables in particular, I guess those with MS Office tend to be more content with UR for complex notes. I wouldn't want to store notes in a separate container since they're often tightly integrated with other content. But I'm slowing down these days-mostly to create (a little) more time for other things. LOL! I've got the same weakness (or we could say passion) when it comes to new software.
#TREEDBNOTES TEMPLATES HOW TO SOFTWARE#
Unfortunately I am pretty much a software addict and whenever any outliner in particular is on sale like this I usually end up grabbing it. I purchased TreeDBNotes Pro just a few minutes ago at Bits. Please comment/correct any areas where lack of experience with TDB may have affected my impressions or perhaps comment on relevant plans in TDB's development roadmap. I believe UR has more power and flexibility overall, but it takes more digging and experimentation to find and use it all. Overall, TDB seems easier to get started and use as a beginner and offers a little more in the way of eye candy. Could be my search options are not set properly. With TDB my search returned notes containing a particular word, but not contacts. UR search includes powerful full-text search and also finds words, phrases, tags anywhere within the DB. UR appears to do a significantly better job of storing web pages and html-formated emails at closer to original fidelity. I like the reminder/alert function in TDB better-nicer looking and includes a calendar which UR does not currently have. without having to navigate to a separate tree. So, for example, with UR you can have tasks in separate folders or together with related notes, docs, web pages, images, etc. UR has one tree per DB, but any type of item can go into the tree. However, it appears each tree is limited to a single template such as note, task, contact or password. I heard TDB allows multiple trees within a database which I see is true.
TDB appears to have only copy and paste or import of the text, rich text or html file types it supports. In addition to text, rich text, DOC and HTML, Ultra Recall handles a wide variety of file/document types including PDF, XLS, XLSX, DOCX, image files, etc.įurthermore, it's possible to copy or link items into UR with drag and drop or copy and link buttons integrated into IE and Outlook.
This approach is less convenient and self-contained, but gives UR more power and flexibility. UR's rich text editor is limited, but gets around this by letting you view/edit any document type in it's native editor and save directly back into UR. TDB definitely has superior rich text editing capabilities. Any significant mistakes or omissions? I could have gone into even more UR features, but these are the things that stood out for me:Īs a long-time Ultra Recall user, the positive comments about TreeDBNotes finally inspired me to take a quick look (by no means thorough or in-depth). Here are my comments posted on Bits du Jour, but I'm leery about doing quick-n-dirty evaluations. Let's just say my positive feelings about UR were only strengthened. The current appearance on Bits du Jour prompted me to do a quick comparison. I've read discussions about TreeDBNotes over the years.
0 kommentar(er)
